Saturday, December 2, 2017

Plinking Around in the Family Past

Is there a switch that gets flipped when you reach a certain age that makes you interested in genealogy?

I rather suspect there is.  It makes sense.  As a historian, one of the things that I have noticed over my career is that people tend to become more interested in history when they have more of their own history to be interested in.  The young look forward, not back, and that’s entirely appropriate.  Their lives are in the future and they need to focus on that.  But as you get older and more and more of your life recedes into the past, the past becomes a much more interesting thing.

And there is no past so interesting to a person as their own past.

I’ve been plinking around on my family genealogy project for a few years now, as time and resources permit.  I spent a couple of summers scanning all of the family photos, for example.  Everyone has a copy of them now so even if my house gets spirited off to Oz in one of the tornadoes that occasionally grace us with their presence here in the midwest, the photos will survive.  I’ve also scanned the small trove of documents that we’ve collected as a family – at least the ones that have come down to me.  I included those scans with the photos when I sent them out, so they too will not fall into the hands of the Lollipop Guild.  And that’s where things have stood for a while.

A week or two ago I found myself in my office not wanting to do anything of any productive value, a disturbingly common feeling these days.  So I decided to return to my plinking.

And I struck gold.

Genealogists are obsessive people, prone to do things that normal human beings would never even consider.  High on that list is going through cemeteries, cataloguing all of the gravestones, and putting that information into searchable databases for people like me to explore.  I’m grateful that they do such things, though kind of dumbfounded at the same time.  That’s okay.  People feel the same way about some of the things I do, too.

I stumbled into one of these databases and there, on my first try, was my great-great-grandmother.  I was actually looking for her daughter, who had the same name, but there you go.  Most of the information on her record lined up well with the papers I already had, so I’m pretty certain it was her.  She had a lot of children, and all but one of them were listed as descendants in the database (the one, of course, being my own great-grandmother, the one I was originally looking for, but in the defense of the database she was buried in a different cemetery so the connections might not have been clear to the people who built it).  My great-great-grandmother’s record also listed her parents.

And their parents.  And so on.

I tracked this back to a guy named James Taylor (presumably not the singer), who was born in 1797 in Ireland and, if his children are any indication, arrived here sometime in the first third of the nineteenth century.  I’m not sure what part of Ireland he was from – I’m guessing the northern part, since that’s where most of the Protestants live and I come from a long line of those – but there it is. 

I also found the Civil War vet whose discharge papers my parents had framed and hanging on their wall back in the old house.  He was one of those 90-Day Wonders at the beginning of the war, when everyone thought it would be a short, glorious victory for their side and be done by Christmas.  His company served in some of the campaigns of the summer of 1861 before reaching the end of its service and being mustered out in August, whereupon he presumably went back to being a blacksmith since he does not appear to have thought enough of military service to reenlist. 

On the other side of my family, I found my great-uncle John and his wife, who it turns out are buried here in Wisconsin, not all that far from where Kim grew up.  I’ve been to that town, actually.  It has a bar with a jackalope on the wall.  I was there when my great-aunt was still alive, in fact, though I had no idea she was there or even what her name was, to be honest.  John died in the early 1970s and we sort of lost track of her after that. 

All of these people had siblings and inlaws and children, so there are all sorts of new avenues to explore now.

I can see this becoming a big project at some point soon.

4 comments:

  1. Any McClintocks in your search? I have an 800+ page volume tracing my ancestry back to the early 1600's. Maybe we're related!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not yet! If I find any, I'll let you know. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Genealogy Bug bit me back in the late 1980s. My Paternal family line is Welch, but I only documented back to my Great-grandfather. From there on back is a blank wall.

    My Maternal family line is purely Swiss/German. And always in that order. Traced that family back to Origin in 1362.

    The BIG ONE was my chosen moniker. The Lucy name comes from my Dad's mother's line. Linked to but never confirmed to be actual English Royalty, dating all the way back to the year 1060.

    http://www.rickmansworthherts.com/webpage4.htm

    (You may not want to visit that site. It's huge, and it is real easy to get lost in there ... even if you're not related!)

    When the Genealogy Bug moved in, I lost about 9 months of free time. Salt Lake City is home to the LDS Church, and one of the largest genealogy research centers in the world. You can get lost in there, to!

    Genealogy. It's fun. It's fascinating. It's time & resource consuming. And probably what bestowed upon me my enduring fun with OCD. Keep a snorkel handy and remember to come up for air and re-socialization with your family from time to time.

    Hoppy Hunting.

    Lucy

    ReplyDelete
  4. I grew up in an area settled by the Welsh, which is why the prospect of w's and y's as vowels never fazed me.

    My mom's side disappears into the fog of Italian record-keeping around 1900 and I haven't even tried to penetrate that yet. My dad's, however, seems to go back a ways. Lots of Scots Irish, English, and probably other parts of the British Isles as well.

    I'd happily get lost in the archives of the LDS church, even if I do know the odd little theological quirk that led them to create it (short version: "posthumous conversion for all ancestors of current Mormons," which gets them into trouble every couple of years when they decide to do that to all the Jews who died at Auschwitz). Ancestry.com is an LDS company, if I remember that right. Someday when I have time I will sign up.

    I'll keep my airpack handy!

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for commenting! If this post has aged sufficiently your comment may go to a moderation queue for further examination. If I decide it is spam it will be deleted without comment. My definition of spam may not match yours. This is not my problem.